Tag: vidiactive

The Future Of Broadcasting Event

An interesting and convivial discussion occurred at the Future of Broadcasting event this evening. The subject was, perhaps, unrealistically broad and many of the usual themes appeared: business models, social television, discovery, regulation and rights.

Perhaps the most interesting change that I’ve seen from similar events five or six years ago is how accepting and comfortable everyone in the industry now is with the changes going on.
Perhaps the most revealing and shocking admission was from Ofcom on why they treat scheduled, on demand and online content differently. Apparently what it comes down to is whether someone chooses to access content or might ‘happen’ upon it. A truly mindblowing way of thinking, especially after what happened to Google execs in the Italian courts this week. The Ofcom representative was very game and eloquent, but I would argue that a service like YouTube needs more regulation than services like ITV, not less.
For my part, I rather brazenly took the opportunity to plug the companies that I’m involved with, but for a reason: I would not have invested money and time into these companies if I did not believe that they represented key technological pieces in the future of television.
VidZapper is a video management platform, like many others, but it has hooks, bells and whistles at a price that no other professional system can match. It deals with delivery.
Rights Tracker represents the big missing link in the whole online video ecosystem and the company is about to announce a number of new initiatives that will take online rights management to a new level. It deals with rights.
Vidiactive is a company that changes the way television is produced and consumed so radically, but so seamlessly that it’s difficult to describe. Think of it as the ability to find any video content that’s available on the web and watch it on your big screen, and then to share it with your friends and contacts. It deals with the social and delivery aspects of future TV.
Finally, TV Everywhere is currently investing in a ‘discovery’ company, which will be another key piece in the the TV landscape of the future.
So, these, I believe are some of the key elements that will define television in the future.


See more here:
The Future Of Broadcasting Event

Share/Save/Bookmark

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Australian Rules

The recent case in Australia of Roadshow Films Pty Ltd v iiNet Ltd (No.3) brings into focus the challenges of policing the internet and the challenges involved in the forthcoming Digital Economy Bill.

Basically the Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft had notified iiNet that their subscribers had been repeatedly illegally downloading Hollywood movies using illegal sites and iiNet had taken no steps to prevent this. iiNet were successfull in arguing that they had safe harbour as they had not “authorised” this infringement. Clearly they were aware of the infringement but had not authorised it.

From a commercial perspective the rights holders and their representatives realise that it is very difficult to chase down hundreds of individuals and would much rather go after a corporation who might be able to pay damages (and legal fees) such as an ISP. From the ISP’s perspective they don’t really want the overhead of shutting down users and also the lost revenue……..cutting off your own customers is never appealing.

Someone is going to have to pay for an anti-piracy service to avoid meltdown in this area but the tough question is who ? The content owners have the most to lose so they should pay something but at the same time there needs to be the ability to shut down the internet connections of repeat offenders as well as remove the ability of the pirates to make money via AdSense.

Policing Piracy is a cost to all in the internet value chain that is not going away – the difficult question is how to fairly allocate that cost.


See the rest here:
Australian Rules

Share/Save/Bookmark

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Zen and the Death Of Hardware

I remember seeing my first HiFi stack and being awe struck (although some of the shine went when I realised that the amp, turntable, radio and cassette chasis were actually all joined together and not the expensive, separate high tech machines they appeared to be). We have been through an age where hardware has dominated, but the result of convergence is that pretty much every hardware device seems increasingly to do what every other hardware device does.

OK, your iPhone doesn’t make tea, but there are plenty of places where you can use it to order tea; now set top boxes are being consumed by LCD screens, there is no longer any need for the satellite receiver, the DVD player, the Blu-ray player and the OTT box, and the cable modem, router and telephone might go the same way.
People (very well, men) like to buy ‘stuff’. Now that we can’t really soup up cars any more since the engine is sealed and the body work is under warranty what do we do ? The car already has sat nav, voice controlled phone, ninety speakers and a sound system that can bring down buildings.
We are at the beginning of the death of the device. With projectors being added to phones even the need for a screen is becoming marginal.
So, iPods did away with the rows of CDs, eBooks have been the death of my library and internet Tv has led to the demise of my DVD collection. Now the devices that used to serve all these media are morphing into one. Perhaps all we need is an iPad and an empty room….


Zen and the Death Of Hardware

Share/Save/Bookmark

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Has Apple delivered the digital content model ?

A fascinating week for the digital media industry with Endemol revealing “banker” tendencies by delivering @33% of profits from buying back their own debt from hedgefunds, ITV appoint a new CEO, Sky deliver very strong results plus go 3D and the IPad is launched to mixed reviews.

A few numbers to throw into this – ITV revenues in the first 9 months of 2009 were £1.9 billion, Sky’s recently released 6 month revenues were £2.9 billion…….but wait for it Googles UK revenues in the first 9 months of 2009 were £1.9 billion and the Apple app store having launched in 2007 with 11 apps is now running to 140,000 apps and is estimated to generate £1.5 billion per year.

In no time at all the app store has taken a bit slice of the content revenue pie and the consumer clearly loves it as the IPod touch is likely to soon overtake the Iphone in sales terms and its major USP is the app store.

The rate of growth of Google and the App store is amazing and outside of the highly specific and clearly well executed Sky model the remainder of the traditional UK media industry is left paddling around in the detritus.

The Ipad opens the possibility of digital text and video being delivered to the consumer on a paid for basis – which might actually generate profit for content owners. This is in contrast to the YouTube model which neatly leaves most content owners out of the equation.

Interestingly, very recently YouTube have started to approach their content partners to see if they can offer £ to secure rights and recently secured a deal with the Indian Premier League. However, very few YouTube partners make decent revenues from their channels and it seems that being on the app store offers a much better chance of monetizing content.

Perhaps the app store offers content owners the chance to make £ from their efforts in the digital age and the Ipad offers an interface that will work for text and video. Clearly piracy reamins an issue but Apple look like they have moved one big step closer to an economic model for content owners.


Originally posted here:
Has Apple delivered the digital content model ?

Share/Save/Bookmark

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Popup TV

Popup restaurants, sales, live events; in the content industry they talk about ‘windows’. A concept started in the sports and entertainments industry is working its way through many other businesses now, such as catering and retail.

There is one thing that temporality brings – the ability to charge. The release of films has long followed a temporal path that is now that is being challenged by technological developments. Movies have to go to DVDs faster than ever, and soon they will never touch a physical medium.

Look at music – a recorded performance is valueless and pirated. A live event has value. Recorded music has been replaced by live music.

My decade and more’s experience of internet TV informs me that this business is even more susceptible to this trend. Live sells. Live events have always been the single biggest driver for internet TV audiences.

Indeed, the lack of efficiency in exploiting temporality is probably the defining business model underlying TV Everywhere (the company not the cliché). VidZapper enables live events as well as on demand video, Rights Tracker helps define windows for content rights and Vidiactive makes content available on the big screen now.

Time is something none of us can control, and as such it has ultimate value. Time is precious and time is what content owners need to pay the keenest attention to.

It is sad to see how few sports events are available in near real time windows. This is a real business opportunity. But the long term value of these events is next to nothing. There is an unexploited long tail at work.

Time has a great lesson to tell to anyone involved in internet TV.


See the original post:
Popup TV

Share/Save/Bookmark

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
« Previous posts Next posts » Back to top