Tag: tails-they-win

Wide Area Network

The takeover of Velocix by Alcatel Lucent is a coup for the French-American company; I’ve long been an admirer of the company (disclosure: it was founded by my friend Andi Parker and is a supplier to my company, TV Everywhere), which has developed some unique IP in a ‘me-too’ market with its Metro product.

There’s little doubt that Alcatel will turn it into a B2B player (where is should have been positioned anyway) and will leverage its relationships with the major networks to sell the core technology.
The Velocix CDN business is almost certainly not profitable, but there could be some argument for spinning it out.
Meanwhile, Dan Rayburn has issued a list of the remaining CDN players in the market.


Read the original here:
Wide Area Network

Share/Save/Bookmark

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Who’ll Blink First ?

Apparently, ITV is considering charging micropayments for its catch up service. Considering how poor their technology implementation is, this may seem laughable. But there does seem to be an inevitability about charging being introduced to internet delivery of TV.

In ITV's case, if they could get their technology to work then there is no reason why their ad model shouldn't work. Changing busiess models to compensate for poor technology is not going to help, but seeing as it's when they try to play ads that the stream stops for minutes at a time, perhaps getting rid of ads might actually fix the problem (disclosure: I gave up using ITV.com in frustration some months ago, so the technology might have improved).

But with Sky already charging for their service there's little doubt that Five, Channel 4 and Hulu might follow suite and charge for content. If one does it, it might be an excuse for them all to do it.

But the reality is that the gorillas on the block – iPlayer and YouTube – will remain free, so blinking might not help


More:
Who’ll Blink First ?

Share/Save/Bookmark

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Full Circle

So, Joost are becoming a video management system, having singularly failed as a consumer service. The hype surrounding what was the Venice Project was extraordinary, but making the wrong techology calls before getting a foothold in the market was their downfall (actually, these same mistakes were repeated by the BBC, C4 and now by Sky in part).

Ironically, this announcement comes on the same day as Yahoo closes its video management platform, Maven, a company it bought a year and a half ago for nearly $200m.
Joost will becompeting head on with Brightcove, who have made great inroads in this market in recent times, theplatform, the grandaddy of them all, and KIT Media, who now own Narrowstep.
Knowing how tough the VMS market is, I suspect this latest incarnation will be less than successful.


Go here to read the rest:
Full Circle

Share/Save/Bookmark

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

OFCOM Bears Its Teeth

Is the UK television landscape finally changing for the better ? This blog has long argued that the duopoly of the BBC and BSkyB is stifling development, investment and innovation in the media industry.

OFCOM is seriously bearing its teeth with its proposal to force BSkyB to make premium events available to other parties. This is a serious shot across the bow of the UK’s dominant commercial broadcast service which resulted in a rapid response from the Murdoch dominated broadcaster. You have to have some sympathy with BSkyB since they have made the big investments, but the demise of Setanta was, perhaps, the final straw.
However, the response of wannabe broadcaster BT is, coming from a company that has turned being a monopoly in a ‘free’ market, somewhat hypocritical.
Meanwhile, the Director General of the BBC has been equally trenchant in defending its licence against what it terms ‘erosion‘. The reality is that the BBC horribly skew markets in so many areas that it has throttled all the life out of many categories of media, especially local media and is now seeing the wider media turning on it.
A balance between a free market and a regulated market is particularly difficult in the media industry, but it seems that we might be about to see some change for the better in UK media.


Read the original:
OFCOM Bears Its Teeth

Share/Save/Bookmark

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Heads You Lose, Tails They Win

Sport has been the making and breaking of most contemporary television services, from ITV Digital’s disastrous purchase of the minor league rights in UK soccer to the current woes facing Setanta. In the meantime BSkyB has marched on regardless seeing huge success on the back of massive gambles in buying top end sports rights.

The problem with sports right is one that is reflected in many rights markets: the long tail isn’t a linear projection, rather, it is a hockey stick where the value of the ‘head’ is massively disproportionate to the ‘tail’.

Television has been, and remains a generalist medium based on aggregating large audiences; this is very slowly changing with the advent of narrowcast channels.
But the real problem in traditional television is that sports rights are a double edged sword; they are often bought by initiatives without widespread distribution to build audiences – a strategy that has worked for BSkyB, but not for ITV Digital and Setanta.
But markets have a way of finding a level and the current fallout from Setanta’s demise (and I still hope that they will be rescued since British television needs another sports operator), along with other development such as the posturing around F1.
More and more sports are going to find themselves dropping down the long tail, but it’s also likely that other sports will see greater success – cricket, lacrosse and hockey have all seen their rights situations improving.
Gradually, the ubiquity of distribution that’s available via IP will start to level out the long tail, but at the moment it’s more difficult than ever to see anyone challenging the might of BSkyB in the UK

Read the original:
Heads You Lose, Tails They Win

Share/Save/Bookmark

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Back to top