Tag: event

Rooftop Protest at Bristol Bomb Maker

They’re there because Raytheon produce some of the most hideous military hardware imaginable (they claim to be world leaders in “smart” hidware). Bunker busters and cluster bombs being just two examples of their lethal hardware. Their hardware wasn’t smart enough to avoid 62 civilians in Iraq: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/the-proof-marketplace-deaths-were-caused-by-a-us-missile-593074.html As CAAT reports, “Raytheon is the prime contractor for the Tomahawk cruise missile and the JSOW AGM-154, both of which deliver BLU/97B submunitions.” (that’s cluster bombs to you and me). They’ve got a regular stall at DSEi: http://www.caat.org.uk/publications/armsfairs/dsei-2003-report/clusterbombs.php And do you remember Israel’s little bombing frenzy in the summer of 2006? When they blasted Lebanon to smithereens? Well Raytheon’s hardware played its part: http://bristol.indymedia.org.uk/newswire.php?story_id=25266 All that seems reason enough to protest Raytheon’s presence in Bristol. In fact plenty of people have been protesting against Raytheon. Nine fine folk from Northern Ireland were recently (June 2008) “acquitted in Belfast for their action in decommissioning the Raytheon offices in Derry in August 2006. The prosecution could produce not a shred of evidence to counter our case that we had acted to prevent the commission of war crimes during the Lebanon war by the Israeli armed forces using weapons supplied by Raytheon.” http://www.raytheon9.org/ The rooftop protesters want Raytheon, and the rest of the world to know, that there’ll be protests every Thursday at Raytheon’s offices in Bristol. Let’s give ‘em hell! Bristol IndyMedia has regular updates on their front page: http://bristol.indymedia.org.uk/index.php

Continued here:
Rooftop Protest at Bristol Bomb Maker

Share/Save/Bookmark

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Digital tools for citizen journalists

Include information about your target users, principal goals and outcomes, the kind of user experience you will create, and what you consider the “wow factor” of your idea. Explain how you will implement your project.

Via a comprehensive set of learning tools, we empower people with stories to tell to be able to communicate them to a wide audience. Nobody has ever yet designed this, and this lack partly accounts for people getting lost when trying to do video journalism, and failing to produce a successful piece.

A second type of learning experience is the feedback on films from viewers and other journalists via the cms. This can be in the form of live chat.

A third type is forums and wikis on the cms, which can be intiated by the citizen journalist themselves.

The idea overall is to create a network of resources which the community has ownership of, rather than us. This makes sustainability much more likely.

Timeline. Max 350 Words

Detailed workflow management plan and timeline

June 1st 2009 is the ideal time for us to start this project. Our cms will already be working, and we can plug in the tools from this project. The Undercurrents training tour will have run three workshops, enabling the testing of some materials.

4. Project URL

List and briefly explain any URLs associated with your project

http://visionon.tv (this is the basic HTML sight, CMS coming in 3 months time)

http://www.undercurrents.org

http://camptv.info (some examples of outcomes of training run at recent climatecamp)

Project Personnel

1. *Primary Applicant: Briefly describe the role of the Primary Applicant. Max 50 words

Richard Hering will be responsible for the learning tools, and will run the training workshops which will test them.

Hamish Campbell will coordinate the development of the cms and the development of software tools.

*Describe the most innovative learning environment in which you have participated. Max 200 words

Recently at the Camp for Climate Action in 2008 http://camptv.info we worked with different groups to run a solar-powered live-edit IPTV studio. DIY workshops include practical filmmaking, solar-power video and the blogging/journalism divide. More than 20 shows were produced over the 4 days by a mixture of experienced video makers and journalists and first-time participants. The studio space provided a focus for lively peer2peer-based learning and a real model for grassroots media production/re-production.

Our favourite show was this book review http://climatecamptv.blogspot.com/2008/08/debate-how-to-campaign-against-climate_6849.html

And the best video report by a first time producer was: http://climatecamptv.blogspot.com/2008/08/confiscations-by-police.html

If the cms had been in place, this learning environment would have been considerably enhanced, though streaming site distribution has meant encouraging feedback for the above first-timer (over 7000 views and 78 comments on youtube).

Briefly describe the role of the project collaborators, if applicable. Max 350 words.

In addition, we will be working with many of the grassroots citizen journalist groups who currently provide training and access to video for campaigning organisations, eg Camcorder Guerilllas from Glasgow, Schnews from Brighton, the transmission project, indymedia etc.

3. Project Staff. Max 350 words.

The project will have some of the most experienced staff in alt-media and media advocacy training who have run numerous peer2peer based workshops over the last 10 years.

De Murphy (project sercretary) works part-time as an administrator and bookkeeper at Undercurrents. For this project, the fact she is also a film producer and trainer gives her a very valuable undertanding of the needs of the project.

Owen English –

Project Budget

1. *Budget Amount

2. *Itemized Budget

Itemize your project budget in table format (e.g., Excel). Use 10 or 12 pt font. “.XLS”, “.DOC” or “.PDF” format required. Please be advised that the selection committee may require budget revisions upon review. Budget categories might include the following, as well as any others deemed necessary by the applicant:

15

$98087

3. *Budget Narrative

Explain all budget items and the rationale for the budget in detail. Provide the amounts recorded in the itemized budget. Max 500 words.

The direction of the project is split between two experienced people of complementary skills, where one looks after the learning tools development (1), and the other looks after the cms development (2). They each receive a modest part-time wage (for 2 days a week).

Programmers are then necessary to do the cms and the re-skinning of the encoding tool. Liferay is our chosen cms platform. Initial work designing the user interface will be done by our director in charge of the cms, who will hand over the detailed coding work to Liferay’s team, who are the best to carry out this work (3). Our director will also blue-print the encoding tool re-skin, and commission the programmer responsible for the re-skin of Miro for our VOTV player (4).

The coordination and outreach nature of this project needs a part-time secretary to enable smooth running between its different parts (5).

(6) is a contribution to VOTV for server costs.

We need editing laptops and a hi-spec camera to make the training videos. (7, 8). For the security of the project, we need back-up hard drive storage. (9)

We have kept office costs as low as possible (10).

Travel and subsistence allows us to go to 6 training workshops around Britain to test the materials. (11)

Indirect costs is a modest percentage of 5% (14).

4. Other Funding

List all sources that have already funded or have committed to funding your project. For each source, list the amount of support, the source’s general expectations, the informal or formal agreement regarding ownership of any work products, and any agreements about profits.

No funders have been sought for the VisionOnTV project.110K

Undercurrent 34K

The projects long term goal is to be self stutaning from ethical advertising and copurate advertising on sindicated websights – the videos are distributed to more than 40 web locations as well as hosted by us.

All the content produced will be creative commons (maybe not all – so need a better way of saying this)

There are currently no other funders for this participatory learning project, but already three other funders for essential parallel parts the project which the “Digital Environment for Citizen Journalists” plugs into.

£100,000 for core VisionOnTV project over 2 years from the Joseph Rowntree Reform Trust

£36,000 from the Esmee Fairbairn Trust for the Undercurrents Training Tour, plus £18,000 applied for to the Cooperative Community Fund for the rest of this.

5. Other Potential Funding

List other sources to which you are applying or have applied for funding, with results pending.

We are applying to the Knight News Challenge in this round (deadline: 1st November) for funding to expand the Liferay iptv cms for VisionOnTV). This does not include the participatory learning aspects bid for here.

Implementation

1. *Outcomes and Achievements. Max 250 Words.

How will you know if your project is succeeding post implementation? What sorts of indicators will you look for?

Productive traffic on the cms will tell us a lot, but more importantly the proof will lie in regular new films being produced. A major strength of this proposal is that it would be part of an ongoing project to distribute alternative media, where content from newcomers will always be noticed, appreciated and welcomed.

More widely, we aim for the VisionOnTV project itself to be re-skinned many times, and that the learning tools and software would go with it. So we will partly judge our success by other people not merely producing their own content, but their rss feeds, TV channels, and maybe even Tv stations, with open source and standards.

2. *Troubleshooting. Max 250 Words.

Describe one or two ways that your project may not succeed and what you would learn from this failure. What will you do if you see your project struggling or failing during the project period? How would you know?

Trolls could attack the open resource wikis and forums with youtube-style abuse. This could be very off-putting for first-time reporters seeking a nurturing environment via the cms. To root this out, we will implement the flagging of problem posts and all users will have an activity wall, which means it will be very easy for admins to spot troublemakers and to deal with them in an open way.

More generally, there is a “save the internet” battle for the openness of the internet at the moment. If this fails the openness that is at the core of participatory learning will be missing, thus our project could become irrelevant. If closed formats become dominant on the web, then the standards we are hoping to set will be pushed to the sidelines. However this is not very likely. Closed video formats such as WMV and Quicktime are failing after hundreds of millions of dollars have been spent pushing them for the last 10 years. Meanwhile more open standards such as H264, RSS and torrents as flourishing. We see the training tools we produce as contributors to this “downhill battle” for open web standards.

3. *Social Networking, Peer-to-Peer Mentoring, and Professional Guidance. Max 350 Words.

A social networking site, designed and moderated by HASTAC, will support winners in information sharing, group communications, participatory learning, collaboration, and peer mentoring. Online workshops by experts will also be hosted on the site. In what areas will your project/team benefit from the help of previous Competition winners and expert advisors (e.g., management, marketing, business models, human resources)? What will you be able to contribute to this online community effort? How might your project work with other projects in the field?

We are very excited to be working with other projects that support open standards and hope to exchange content via RSS and custom channel embeds to enrich user experience on our site and syndicate video to there project sites.

We hope the HASTAC site will open doors to outreach beyond the UK by connecting us to other like-minded people.

Everything in our project is open source. Anyone can re-skin or adapt any element of it, and we actively encourage other projects to do this.

4. *Copyrighted Material

Does your project require use of copyrighted material or other intellectual property? Applications with the intent to obtain approval are acceptable. Distribution of an award is contingent upon approval. (Before completing review carefully the terms of the Intellectual Property and Privacy Policies; these terms apply to all award recipients as a condition of being funded. By applying, you agree to the terms defined in these policies.)

The grant will all go only to build creative commons outcomes.

5. *Profits

If your project generates profits, how do you intend to allocate them? You will need to explain why revenue creation is necessary and how any revenue will be used or shared in furtherance of the charitable objectives of the Competition. (Before completing, review carefully the terms of the Intellectual Property and Privacy Policies; these terms apply to all award recipients as a condition of being funded. By applying, you agree to the terms defined in these policies.)

The outcome will be empowered groups of community-minded people – the project will not make profit in financial terms.

More here:
Digital tools for citizen journalists

Share/Save/Bookmark

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Describe your project:

This is a 3-year project which uses IPTV to grow local democracy via news.

We already have foundation funding to create an IPTV news station (VisionOnTV), and are bidding to build a multi-faceted but really simple-to-use content management system for this station, so that it can become comprehensively interactive and realize its potential for social change. It is essential that the CMS development be rooted in a local community, so that it can be tested and refined. We are therefore also seeking funding to facilitate Hackney TV, a VisionOnTV local channel in a London borough undergoing rapid change under the shadow of the 2012 Olympics, which will be this testing ground. If the CMS is successful in Hackney, it can be replicated globally.

Hackney TV will be a mix of local news and views, including rapid-turnaround, “live-edit” studio shows, as well as news reportage.

We will fully exploit the “micro-broadcasting” that IPTV enables. Our cms is based on the award-winning Liferay system, which is open source. It will encourage physical connections between people that traditional media has no power to do, beginning with neighbours recognising each other, through simultaneous chat while playing a film, to the creation of forums and physical groups around important community issues. Personalised adverts and info-verts will make TV into a community noticeboard. The cms will also draw in data from other existing national and global social networks, blogs, corporate news etc, so that it is constantly up-dated with new info. News becomes interactive through “E-decision” plebiscites by text, web voting and interactive IPTV booths in public venues, community cafes etc. Local business sponsorship by automated advertising makes it sustainable.

How will your project improve the way news and information are delivered to geographic communities?

The focusing of the CMS group on a borough-sized community is the key to grassroots news. However, citizen journalist video production generally lacks the key skills and focus to substitute fully the role that top-down media currently plays. Quality control and fact-checking are absent, while disruptive posts are tolerated. Our cms will include these controls and thus feed relevant and accessible news from the grassroots back to the grassroots.

The 2012 Olympics will bring rapid change for the communities of Hackney in East London, over which they need to have control. A local interactive news service dedicated to their needs will give them a voice and enable them to shout louder.

How is your idea innovative? (new or different from what already exists)

Our project works both as “lean-back” TV and as interactive video on the web. The huge problem with other CMS’s is that they are “out of the box” and designed by techies for techies, whereas we are outreaching beyond this.

We are broadcasting video content to drive interaction rather than relying on people simply to interact in an empty space.

We aim to create real-world communities by virtual tools. Live chat while watching a film will turn into forum posts, relationship links and involvement in outside groups, outside of a walled garden. Physical meet-ups will be pushed, via screenings, action groups or socializing. Local info-verts will be personalised to you. Currently, no other video site has a sense of community like this.

What experience do you or your organization have to successfully develop this project?



Undercurrents is an award-winning media charity of 15 years’ standing, which coined the term “video activism”. We pre-empted the media revolution of the 21st century by putting camcorders in the hands of environmental activists during the 1990s. Popular London magazine Time Out tagged our work as ‘The News you don’t see on the News’. We put views from the grassroots in front of both the wider public and decision makers.

As part of the visionOntv project, we recently ran a studio at the Camp for Climate Action in Kent, England, making 20 shows in the space of a week, syndicated to over 40 streaming sites and our own video player application (a customised version of Miro).

Hamish Campbell, Richard Hering and Paul O’Connor have 45 years of video trainer and producer experience between them.

Hamish is the CEO of visionOntv, which was his idea. He is designing the parameters of the CMS and all other software, and envisioning the trajectory of the project as a whole.

Richard is also an award-winning investigative reporter for British TV, winning the Bill Travers Award for Environmental Investigation ’97, the Amnesty International Press Award ’98, and the Rory Peck Features Award ’99, on subjects such as the illegal mahogany trade from Brazil and the effects of the nuclear test program in China.

Paul is co-founder of Undercurrents, and De Murphy is our financial manager.

See more here:
IPTV – From local news to local democracy

Share/Save/Bookmark

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

DigitalTools for Citizen Journalists

Via a comprehensive set of learning tools, we empower people with stories to tell to be able to communicate them to a wide audience. Tools range from a practical, easily-repeatable template for absolute beginners to essential gap-filling tools for people who already have some training.
Alternative iptv station VisionOnTV will provide a unique home for the reports produced, as well as syndicating content to over 40 major streaming and search sites. VOTV is already funded to add them to thematic seasons or news magazines, together with documentaries and studio shows.

We will re-cast the software tools for production so that the interface on opening it is stupidly simple, and more complex options are a click away.

The most exciting thing is the unprecedented content management system (cms) which integrates all the learning tools and plugs live social networking into the playing of video content. It not only enables simultaneous feedback on films being watched, but crucially gives the opportunity to create on-line and face-to-face communities around shows and issues, and
forums for participatory learning. Learning tools will be tested via Undercurrents’ already-funded training programme. The interactive components of these will be plugged into VisionOnTV’s cms.

video reportage, e.g. pre-production, shooting, editing etc. Each station will also link to text and video tutorials. Nobody has ever yet designed this, and this lack partly accounts for people getting lost when trying to do video journalism, and failing to produce a successful piece.
A second type of learning experience is the feedback on films from viewers and other journalists via the cms. This can be in the form of live chat.

A third type is forums and wikis on the cms, which can be intiated by the citizen journalist themselves. The idea overall is to create a network of resources which the community has ownership of, rather than us. This makes sustainability much more likely.

Project Timeline. Max 350 Words.

June 1st 2009 is the ideal time for us to start this project. Our cms will already be working, and we can plug in the tools from this project. The Undercurrents training tour will have run three workshops, enabling the testing of some materials.

Project URL
http://visionon.tv (this is the basic HTML sight, CMS coming in 3 months time)
http://www.undercurrents.org
http://camptv.info (some examples of outcomes of training run at recent Camp for Climate Action)

Primary Applicant: Briefly describe the role of the Primary Applicant. Max 50 words.

Richard Hering will be responsible for the learning tools, and will run the training workshops which will test them.
Hamish Campbell will coordinate the development of the cms and the development of software tools.

Describe the most innovative learning environment in which you have participated. Max 200 words.

Recently at the Camp for Climate Action in 2008 http://camptv.info we worked with different groups to run a solar-powered live-edit IPTV studio. DIY workshops include practical filmmaking, solar-power video and the blogging/journalism divide. More than 20 shows were produced over the 4 days by a mixture of experienced video makers and journalists and first-time participants. The studio space provided a focus for lively peer2peer-based learning and a real model for grassroots media production/re-production.

Our favorite show was this book review http://climatecamptv.blogspot.com/2008/08/debate-how-to-campaign-against-climate_6849.html
And the best video report by a first time producer was: http://climatecamptv.blogspot.com/2008/08/confiscations-by-police.html

If the cms had been in place, this learning environment would have been considerably enhanced, though streaming site distribution has meant encouraging feedback for the above first-timer (over 7000 views and 78 comments on youtube).

Project Collaborators and Roles (if applicable)
Schnews,
Camcorder Guerillas,
Indymedia,
These are some of the groups we will be working with.

Project Staff. Max 350 words.

De Murphy (Project Secretary) works part-time as an administrator and bookkeeper at Undercurrents. For this project, the fact she is also a film producer and trainer gives her a very valuable understanding of the needs of the project
Owen English (Programmer) – has already customized the VisionOnTV player application.
Budget Amount
$96,932

Other Funding
There are currently no other funders for the participatory learning project, but already three other funders for essential
parallel parts of the project which the â Digital Tools for Citizen Journalistsâ plugs into.
£100,000 for core VisionOnTV project over 2 years from the Joseph Rowntree Reform Trust
£36,000 from the Esmee Fairbairn Trust for the Undercurrents Training Tour, plus £18,000 applied for to the Cooperative Community Fund for the rest of this.

Other Potential Funding

We are applying to the Knight News Challenge in this round (deadline: 1st November) for funding to expand the Liferay iptv cms for VisionOnTV. This does not include the participatory learning aspects bid for here.

Outcomes and Achievements. Max 250 Words.

Productive traffic on the cms will tell us a lot, but more importantly the proof will lie in regular new films being produced. A major strength of this proposal is that it would be part of an ongoing project to distribute alternative media, where content from newcomers will always be noticed, appreciated and welcomed. More widely, we aim for the VisionOnTV project itself to be re-skinned many times, and that the learning tools and software would go with it. So we will partly judge our success by other people not merely producing their own content, but
their rss feeds, TV channels, and maybe even Tv stations, with open source and standards.

Troubleshooting. Max 250 Words.

Trolls could attack the open resource wikis and forums with youtube-style abuse. This could be very off-putting for first-time reporters seeking a nurturing environment via the cms. To root this out, we will implement the flagging of problem posts and all users will have an activity wall, which means it will be very easy for admins to spot troublemakers and to deal with them in an open way.

More generally, there is a save the internet battle for the openness of the internet at the moment. If this fails the openness that is at the core of participatory learning will be missing, thus our project could become irrelevant. If closed formats become dominant on the web, then the standards we are hoping to set will be pushed to the sidelines. However this is not very likely. Closed video formats such as WMV and Quicktime are failing after hundreds of millions of dollars have been spent pushing them for the last 10 years. Meanwhile more open standards such as H264, RSS and torrents as flourishing. We see the training tools we produce as contributors to this downhill battle for open web standards.

Social Networking, Peer-to-Peer Mentoring, and Professional Guidance. Max 350 Words.

We are very excited to be working with other projects that support open standards and hope to exchange content via RSS and custom channel embeds to enrich user experience on our site and syndicate video to there project sites. Anyone can re-skin or adapt any element of it, and we actively encourage other projects to do this.

Copyrighted Material

The grant will all go only to build creative commons outcomes.

Profits

The outcome will be empowered groups of community-minded people – the project will not make profit in financial terms.

What is your organization’s purpose and when was it founded?

Undercurrents is a charity formed in 1993.
VisionOnTV is ltd company formed in 2008.

Original post:
DigitalTools for Citizen Journalists

Share/Save/Bookmark

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Here is the original:
Solar powered video studio – across the USA

Share/Save/Bookmark

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
« Previous posts Next posts » Back to top