Tag: digital-fallout

Winds Of Change

I rather lie the windy city, and spent a lot of time there due to an ill advised marriage. Now Chicago has only bankrupt newspapers. This is a market of almost ten million people, with no daily newspaper. Wow.

When I started touting the phrase ‘narrowcasting‘ in its modern sense (it used to refer to closed circuit tv systems), I had in mind, particularly, the representation of specialist, non-mainstream sports, hobbies, interests and pastimes and the rise of hyperlocal media.
After twelve years of selling TV over the internet, I think my initial instincts have proven right, but when it comes to my narrowcasting thesis, the jury is still out. But I still passionately believe that narrowcasting will become the media trend we have to watch.
I write often of an ‘audience of one’, or even a ‘market of one’. That a market of ten million isn’t enough to sustain a daily newspaper is a real sign of the times. This is media reinventing itself in front of our eyes.
The winds of change are blowing our way…

See original here:
Winds Of Change

Share/Save/Bookmark

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Back To The Future

It seems that more and more US content providers are retrenching away from ad driven content and looking at PPV models for their Internet TV content. The math is simple. At top whack, ten ad views in an hour show will get you 60c, whereas a PPV payment will get you $0.99, or even $1.99.

But this is a model that has already widely failed. Will revisiting it now that internet TV viewing is more established actually work ? I think not.
So, some of the service providers in the US are looking at the model Sky has adopted in the UK – you only get to view online if you’ve paid for it offline, or rather, on your traditional service.  They’re undoubtedly doing this with one eye on the competitions from other, new service providers, trying to shore up their traditional services whilst extending them online.
I can’t help feeling that it’s one step forwards, two steps backwards.

Back To The Future

Share/Save/Bookmark

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Self Publishing

HP’s new self-publishing magazine service, CloudMag is fascinating. It begs the question when somone will do the same for video… Or was that YouTube ?

Read the original here:
Self Publishing

Share/Save/Bookmark

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Sling Content

Sling Media, makers of the Slingbox have quietly been positioning themselves as a video portal, adding to their core business of making home TV shows available wherever you are.
Sling is now part of sat giant EchoStar and therefore has some clout in the content world.
I guess that it’s inevitable that all hardware manufacturers realise that they need ‘software’ at some point and go into the content business.
Indeed, the TV content business can increasingly be seen as a market of aggregators and wannabees served by the wholesalers (i.e. the programmer makers or distributors).
There’s an interesting marketplace in the middle.

Source:
Sling Content

Share/Save/Bookmark

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Can We Have It Back ?

Well, here we are, London is apparently hosting the next Bretton Woods.. So moronic anarchists (guys, why don’t you just kill each other and get it over and done with before making a mess on our TV screens if that’s your world view…). Actually, let’s keep with anarchists. My local anarchist when I grew up became a town planner,  ended up sending a flyover dug forty foot deep through my home town and built a supermarket on the beautiful, beautiful seafront of my home town. Thanks, Mark. I’m sure you’re now very senior within the council and due to lead the whole of Wales into bunkerdom one day soon.. 

So, anarchists are real people who can’t be bothered to work as hard as the rest of us, who manipulate and use anyone who they come across. And then compromise beyond belief… They are parasites and morons, but thankfully, do not take this the next step into islamic nihilism.
A bit like the bankers they loathe. Except they do things on an industrial scale. The City of London in the past decade makes the British Empire look like a global welfare state.
The bankers have taken trillions from poor people and ordinary people and spent it on their domains in offshore resorts (of course, they don’t pay tax), as well as their houses in the Cotswolds and art by that moron Damian whatshisname, who even managed to take the money people in and got some of that ill gotten lolly into his lil ol bank account – just a half billion or so (nice one fella…). They put up with stupid socialism because it was, well, stupid, like everything else Tony did, and Gordon lapped up with glee and that stupid smile…
So, now. Totally straight question. When do we get our money back, Gordon ? And Tony, when are you going to pay all of that back; a question I couldn’t even ask of that ogre Thatcher ?
You get paid bonuses for success, but there were  no successes, just short term scams. So now, can we have our money back ?
G1, G3, G7, G20, G30, G50. Whatever. Can we now, please, have our money back. And our morality with it ?

See the original post:
Can We Have It Back ?

Share/Save/Bookmark

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
« Previous posts Next posts » Back to top