Tag: digital-britain

Lord Carter’s Digital Britain plan washed up

Website: Rapid TV News

The UKs ‘Digital Britain’ plan, the expensive brainchild of Lord Carter, an erstwhile unelected member of Gordon Brown’s back office strategy team and Communications Minister, has died in the ‘end of term’ rush to wrap up parliamentary business.

Out has gone Carter’s highlight idea, the £6 a line tax to fund broadband expansion.

The plan also envisioned a closer co-operation between BBC Worldwide and Channel 4.

Out has gone more power for Ofcom.

Out has gone a scheme to replace regional ITV newscasts with independent news productions.

Still left in the Bill is a clause outlawing online piracy.

Carter left government last summer.

View post:
Share/Save/Bookmark

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

iPlayer On The Canvas

Now, I know they’re meant to be subtly different, but the logic of opening out the BBC’s iPlayer technology has always seemed to make more sense to me than conceiving new initiatives like Kangaroo and Canvas.

After a shady start (thanks to the an emphasis on downloads and P2P), the BBC’s iPlayer technology is by now peerless and, frankly, makes Sky and ITV look technologically naive.
So, the BBC’s Eric Huggers’s comments at IBC about ‘Open iPlayer‘ make a lot of sense and sees the BBC finally behaving like the public service entity that it is, not a corporate monopolist that it tends towards.
I hope that both the BBC Trust and OFCOM will encourage this before American entities like Hulu come to own what’s left of British TV as it rapidly moves online.


See the original post here:
iPlayer On The Canvas

Share/Save/Bookmark

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Making Google Accountable

There is a fundamental difference between Google’s search engine and its YouTube and Reader products.

The former indexes other people’s content, living on other people’s web servers. There’s little doubt about the usefulness of this model, nor about the veracity of how Google makes most of its money exploiting this, even though it is a virtual monopoly that has not been challenged.

But Google now holds vast amounts of other people’s content on its own servers and seems unable to be accountable for this. So, even though YouTube publishes deplorable and illegal videos on Google’s servers, the company denies responsibility for this content.

Equally, the company want to publish (and control) every book ever published, but will take no responsibility for this either – just the profits.

The media world certainly has changed, but allowing Google to operate under different laws, rules and mores to traditional publishers and broadcasters is sheer madness that the FCC, OFCOM and other regulators should address this immediately.


Excerpted from:
Making Google Accountable

Share/Save/Bookmark

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Can You Spotify It?

Recently, I rigged up a Dell Studio PC (one of the new breed of tiny, quiet desktops) to my LCD using HDMI and then routed the sound through my sound system. I bought a very slick Toshiba wireless keyboard. I then bookmarked the main video sites and use the keyboard as a remote so that I had a ‘proper’ internet TV experience.

But, as fate would have it, the main use I make of this rig is to listen to music. Despite having around 900 albums on the hard drive of this machine and the nice interface from the folks at Windows Media, I still find myself going to Spotify and typing in random artists. The range isn’t perfect by any means (whatever happened to Judie Tzuke, Bandit, Jimmy Barnes and Doll By Doll ?), but it’s just about good enough.
In fact it’s addictive and is, if my acquaintances are anything to go by, replacing radio rapidly in the workplace. Having the iPhone version approved is another boon to the company, who seem to have overtaken pioneers Last.fm and Pandora in the fast lane of future music delivery.
As I sit and wait for snailmailers Lovefilm to send me my latest fix of The Wire, it does beg the question why they can’t do the same for video. Netflix are providing a similar kind of service in the US, but in the UK, Lovefilm are proving very slow to get their online offering sorted.
And it also begs the question as to whether Spotify is subsidising viewers or if it’s got a coherent business model based on advertising or subscription.
Certainly, if Mrrs Murdoch want a nudge in the right direction as to how to charge for online, Spotify, er, hits the spot. Maybe Hulu UK will be their play.
For one, I think Spotify may have stolen their lunch without them noticing.


View post:
Can You Spotify It?

Share/Save/Bookmark

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

BBC Fail In Formula 1

The BBC is spending a fortune of our (if you’re British) money covering the motor racing series Formula 1 (which seems a very bad use of tax money if you ask me..) and they’re doing a dreadful job of it. Despite having two Brits in, ahem, pole position in the competition, the coverage all seems very flat. ITV did a much better job despite the intrusive commercial breaks. F1 is an overtly commercial medium and seeing the BBC dedicating so much time to coverage which is plastered in sponsor logos seems very strange (although that, of course, is the nature of any modern sport).

Moreover, the fact that they won’t disclose how much they paid for the coverage is absolutely scandalous.
On top of this the BBC’s website hasn’t updated the player standings since Friday, although others such as The Times did this immediately. But maybe our tax money is better spent on the well reported management excesses at the Corporation rather than getting someone to work overtime on a Sunday..


Here is the original post:
BBC Fail In Formula 1

Share/Save/Bookmark

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
« Previous posts Back to top