Monthly Archives: December 2008

Police men…

The seams to be a lot of this stuff going on… just finished the first draft of the climate camp policing film more of the same…

The rest is here:
Police men…


Protesters glued inside BBC HQ

Protesters super-glued themselves to glass security gates inside BBC.They protested the lack of balanced reporting of the Israeli bombings on Gaza.

Protesters glued inside BBC HQ


2008 Almanac Review

It’s that time of the year when I look back at my predictions for 2008 and see how well I got ‘it’ (you can read the original here):

Recession – let me start on a low note. There has been little doubt in my mind for some time that we are heading for a considerable slowdown, especially in the UK (I don’t want to get on my economic soap box, but Brown selling off our gold reserves will turn out to be a very bad move). It may not be an official recession, but a credit squeeze will result in falling house prices and consumer demand and the mass lay-offs in the City will have an equal impact). However, the good news is that means more redundant investment bankers will have time sitting at home to watch online video – and there may be considerable opportunities for them to invest in the internet TV sector, which will largely be immune from the economic setbacks. Ironically, I expect the squeeze to have more of an impact in the US, where less debt will mean less investment and a general nervousness amongst investors in riskier ventures. The European market will fare much better.

Hmm, I think I can take 9/10 for this one; only my sanguine outlook for Europe now seems off the mark.

Profitability – with the bad news out of the way, let’s be more positive. At long last, money will be made from online video; both the audience figures and the advertising demand is now of a level where sustainable businesses can be built. This is unlikely to be spectacular in the year ahead, but will point to the sector’s long term viability and potential.

2/10 I think, there were highpoints such as Hulu, but there are very few profitable services and the year ahead will remain tough.

Portal battles – there will be a concerted tussle for eyeballs as existing services try to reach critical mass; services such as Joost and Bablegum will suffer as the big boys push their portals and the UGC sites move into long form.

8/10 – traditional players have won out over upstarts and the likes of Google, NewsCorp and NBC have faired far better than companies such as Joost.

Dealmaking – will be the keyword for the year; already the market feels like .com 1999 as everyone tussles for their niche; there is great scope for some formalised systems to help the deal making (ie online open marketplace for video content and for video ads).

1/10 – this is nowhere in sight, although I personally plan to tackle this through Rights Tracker.

Google makes an impact – video ads and overlays will become an integrated part of Google’s offering in 2008, so will provide an immediate route for monetisation for many channel operators, content owners and producers. However, the Google ad model may also be in for a rough time as more and more advertisers

Hmm, not sure what happened to the original post but I’m up for 3/10 here since Google have singularly failed to monetize their service.

H.264 – driven by existing broadcasters, the quality and widespread compatibility of H.264 will gradually see more mainstream uses in the new year.

8/10 – this year has seen widespread adoption of H.264.

Long form v. short form – a realisation will dawn upon the market that these are two very different media and need to be handled and commercialised very differently.

10/10 – long form took over from short form in a serious way.

Corporate Channels – companies and organisations will start to establish their own channels and not having a corporate TV channel allied to an existing web presence will become increasingly rare.

4/10 – this remains a pipe dream and is likely to do so in the recession

WiMax Networks – already extensively in trials, the mobile companies will face very real competition as WiMax networks are rolled out in urban areas (and may provide better, cheaper bandwidth in many rural areas too).

With the development of white space networks and other similar technologies this probably deserves 4/10 for getting the technology somewhat wrong, and for being too early..

Laser projectors – this may be a somewhat premature prediction, but prototypes of mobile phones with laser projections are already appearing. This is a precursor to the day where the screen as we know it today may no longer exist and the utility of mobile devices takes a further step as you carry around a device that can hold all of your movies and TV (or can stream them) and can also project the videos onto any flat light surface, including your living room wall. However, the next step towards this will be the inclusion ofSTB technologies into flatscreens as the screen manufacturers make their play for the eyeballs in the living room.

This is all happening, albeit slowly – 6/10

The ‘All In One’ Box – to some degree we’ve already seen this appear, but expect your home set top box to do a lot more in future, covering telephony, TV, video on demand, photo and document storage and browsing and instant messaging; also expect to be able to link two or more of the above.

Again, this has become a reality in many places, but certainly not in the UK as yet – 5/10.

Overall, creditable, and probably better than any prediction city scribblers earning ten times more than I do foresaw.

Read more:
2008 Almanac Review



So, we leave 2008 in a broken world. Our very narrow world of Internet TV, with all its fragilities and dependencies, is particularly vulnerable, but also has its strengths and offers a spectrum of opportunities in these difficult times.

I hope that many readers of this blog will take the current environment as a challenge and an opportunity. I certainly believe this is the case. After launching companies in 91, 97, 02 and now, recessions are my following wind. 
Crisis, as the old Chinese proverb goes, is an opportunity sailing on an ill wind.

Go here to see the original:


Shot In The Dark

The current fallout between Universal and YouTube shows how bad the ‘Google Gap’ really is. The revenues generated by Internet TV in no way compare to those generated by traditional TV and traditional media is getting antsy. So, why is this ?

Well, first of all, traditional TV had ubiquity and therefore a currency that will not be matched by any medium ever again. Traditional TV used this to build a hugely dubious metrics system that inflated its relative worth and maintained an aura that is only now finally fading.
The internet delivers true metrics, so this is always going to be at a disadvantage to the obfuscated data that traditional TV works from.
The cost of delivery for Internet TV is higher – there is an incremental cost per viewer that does not exist with traditional TV.
The cost of entry to traditional TV was high, so players tended to work through their business models beforehand. There has been a tendency in the Internet TV world to not worry about business models. Indeed, the subsidies being thrown into the market from everyone from YouTube to the likes of Brightcove have distorted the market. Whilst providing a valuable social service is one thing, this model has actually worked almost in reverse to the long tail principles that prevail online.
The single best thing that could happen to television is for YouTube to start charging its uploaders. This is the model that Google Video has introduced, so why not extend this, especially in a market where ad bucks are becoming rarer than hen’s teeth.
There isn’t a single online video service that has been able to extend a revenue generating business model to content owners yet, so why not throw the onus back onto the content owners themselves – or to other middlemen who can use the content and the technology available to generate businesses – just like the cinema and TV did in the past..

Read the original post:
Shot In The Dark